http://repository.unigal.ac.id:8080/handle/123456789/4131 2026-09-15T20:58:41Z http://repository.unigal.ac.id:8080/handle/123456789/9826 ANALISIS KOMPARATIF TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN BERDASARKAN PASAL 372 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1946 DENGAN PASAL 486 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA NURJAMAN, RIAN ABSTRACT A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE OF EMBEZZLEMENT UNDER ARTICLE 372 OF LAW NUMBER 1 OF 1946 AND ARTICLE 486 OF LAW NUMBER 1 OF 2023 CONCERNING THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL CODE RIAN NURJAMAN NIM. 82338240009 Embezzlement is one of the forms of crimes against property that frequently occurs due to the misuse of trust within a legally valid relationship. The development of Indonesia’s national criminal law through Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code introduces changes in the formulation of embezzlement offenses, which were previously regulated under Article 372 of Law Number 1 of 1946. This study aims to analyze the application of Article 372 of Law Number 1 of 1946 and Article 486 of Law Number 1 of 2023, as well as to examine the comparison between these two provisions in Case Number 232/Pid.B/2024/PN Cms. This research employs a normative juridical method using a statutory approach, case approach, and comparative approach. The research data were obtained through a literature review of statutory regulations, legal doctrines, legal literature, and Decision Number 232/Pid.B/2024/PN Cms. The results of the study indicate that the application of Article 372 of Law Number 1 of 1946 by the Panel of Judges was appropriate because all elements of embezzlement were fulfilled, namely the lawful possession of another person’s property, which was subsequently transformed into unlawful possession. When analyzed based on Article 486 of Law Number 1 of 2023, the defendant’s actions still fulfill the elements of embezzlement. The differences between the two provisions lie in changes in terminology, refinement of legal formulations, and updates to the criminal fine system, while the substance of legal protection for property rights and the prevention of abuse of trust remains maintained. Keywords: Embezzlement, Article 372 Criminal Code, Article 486 National Criminal Code, Comparative Criminal Law, Court Decision. 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z http://repository.unigal.ac.id:8080/handle/123456789/9796 ANALISIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL FACEBOO BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (Studi Kasus Nomor 167/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Cms) RATNASARI, RATIH ABSTRACT ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL POLLUTION GOOD NAME THROUGH FACEBOOK SOCIAL MEDIABASED ON THE INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS LAW (Case Study Number 167/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Cms) Ratih Ratnasari NPM. 82338220011 Ciamis Court Decision Number 167/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Cms, in which case it was determined that YUDI HARYONO committed a criminal act of defamation via the social media Facebook, so that the Public Prosecutor charged him with the primary indictment, namely Article 45A Paragraph (2) and indictment Subsidiary, namely Article 45 paragraph (3) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. In this decision the judge handed down a decision without considering the primary charges. Even though both charges fulfill the legal elements charged. Therefore, the problem formulation is How is the Analysis of the Crime of Defamation of Decision Number 167/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.CMS? What is the reason for the judge's consideration of not applying primary charges against the perpetrator? And what is the analysis of the imposition of criminal sanctions on criminal liability for defamation? This research uses a qualitative descriptive analysis method, namely a research method that describes the research object based on facts that existed and were ongoing at the time the research was conducted. This research aims to determine the application of material criminal law and the judge's considerations in decisions. The results of the discussion concluded that First. The defendant's primary accusation can be declared not legally proven, namely that the sentence "INDONESIA IS PEACEFUL", the panel of judges considers, is not a form of expressing hostility, hatred or insult towards 1 (one) or several groups of the Indonesian people. Second. The judge's consideration in imposing criminal sanctions on the perpetrator of the crime of defamation was that he was declared not guilty of the Primair charge because he did not fulfill the elements of a criminal act as stated in Article 45A paragraph (2) Jo. Article 28 Paragraph (2) Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Transaction Information. Third. Criminal liability by perpetrators of criminal acts of defamation is based on Article 45 paragraph (3) of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. Criminal liability for perpetrators of defamation carries a maximum imprisonment of 4 (four) years and/or a maximum fine of Rp. 750,000,000.00 (seven hundred and fifty million rupiah). Keywords: Crime, Defamation, Decision. 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z http://repository.unigal.ac.id:8080/handle/123456789/9664 MODEL PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DAN PEMULIHAN REPUTASI KREDIT (SLIK OJK) BAGI KORBAN NAME LENDING BERBASIS PASAL 1365 KUH PERDATA DI KABUPATEN CIAMIS Handini, Yusi ABSTRAK MODEL PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DAN PEMULIHAN REPUTASI KREDIT (SLIK OJK) BAGI KORBAN NAME LENDING BERBASIS PASAL 1365 KUH PERDATA Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh maraknya praktik name lending (pinjam nama) yang mengakibatkan korban tercatat sebagai debitur bermasalah dengan status Kolektibilitas 5 pada Sistem Layanan Informasi Keuangan (SLIK) Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), meskipun tidak menikmati manfaat ekonomi dari fasilitas kredit tersebut. Kondisi tersebut menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme perlindungan hukum dan pemulihan reputasi kredit bagi korban belum berjalan secara efektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan perlindungan hukum berdasarkan Pasal 1365 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata terhadap korban name lending, mengidentifikasi hambatan yuridis dan praktis dalam pelaksanaannya, serta merumuskan Model Pemulihan Reputasi Kredit (SLIK OJK) yang efektif bagi korban name lending. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan sosiologis. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara mendalam terhadap korban name lending, praktisi perbankan, dan pakar hukum di Kabupaten Ciamis, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan mengaitkan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, dan teori yang menjadi landasan penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata dapat menjadi dasar perlindungan hukum terhadap korban name lending melalui pembuktian unsur Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH), yaitu penyalahgunaan keadaan (misbruik van omstandigheden), kelalaian (culpa) bank, serta kerugian imateriil berupa rusaknya reputasi kredit korban. Implementasinya masih menghadapi hambatan berupa arsitektur SLIK OJK yang bersifat bottom-up, belum adanya mekanisme rehabilitasi reputasi kredit, kekakuan birokrasi perbankan, sulitnya pembuktian, serta budaya hukum yang dipengaruhi hubungan kekeluargaan. Penelitian ini merumuskan Model Pemulihan Reputasi Kredit (SLIK OJK) yang mengutamakan penyelesaian non-litigasi melalui Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR), Aplikasi Portal Perlindungan Konsumen (APPK), dan mediasi pada Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan (LAPS SJK), serta gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum sebagai ultimum remedium. Model tersebut didukung oleh penyusunan SEOJK, penerapan fitur Status Data Dalam Sengketa (Disputed Data Flag) pada SLIK OJK, serta pendampingan oleh LBH atau BPSK sebagai rekomendasi penguatan perlindungan hukum dan pemulihan reputasi kredit bagi korban name lending. 2026-09-11T00:00:00Z http://repository.unigal.ac.id:8080/handle/123456789/9595 PEMANFAATAN ALOKASI DANA DESA DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PASAL 78 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014 DALAM PEMBANGUNAN DESA AWILUAR KECAMATAN LUMBUNG ABDUL RAHMAN, MOMON ABSTRACT UTILIZATION OF THE VILLAGE FUND ALLOCATION IN RELATION TO ARTICLE 78 OF LAW NUMBER 6 OF 2014 REGARDING VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT IN AWILUAR VILLAGE, LUMBUNG DISTRICT Village development is an effort carried out by the government to improve community welfare through local potential management, infrastructure development, and community empowerment. Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages provides authority for village governments to implement development independently, participatively, and sustainably. However, several obstacles still affect the optimization of village development implementation. This study aims to identify, examine, and analyze the implementation of village development in Awiluar Village, Lumbung District, Ciamis Regency based on Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, the obstacles faced, and the efforts made to overcome these obstacles. This study used a qualitative descriptive method. Data were collected through observation, documentation, and interviews with village officials, the Village Consultative Body, and the community of Awiluar Village on July 2, 2026. Data analysis was conducted through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that the implementation of development in Awiluar Village has been carried out through planning, implementation, community participation, and supervision stages. Development programs focus on infrastructure improvement, community empowerment, and local potential development. The identified obstacles include limited budget availability, village apparatus capacity, supporting facilities, and less optimal community participation. Efforts undertaken include prioritizing development programs, improving apparatus capacity, strengthening coordination, increasing community participation, and optimizing village institutions. Keywords: Village Development Implementation, Awiluar Village, Law Number 6 of 2014, Community Participation, Village Government. 2026-09-10T00:00:00Z